Everything here is drawn from public disclosure records. Our standard is that anyone can trace each figure back to a primary filing, re-run the math, and reach the same result. This page is the receipt: the totals, the rules we used, what we excluded, and how to verify it yourself.
Toda la información proviene de registros públicos de gobierno (contribuciones de campaña y cabildeo). Estos son hechos con su fuente, no acusaciones: contribuir y cabildear es legal y se divulga por ley. Mantenemos solo lo que pudimos confirmar y publicamos también lo que excluimos. Las guías comunitarias en lenguaje sencillo están disponibles en español.
Contributions and lobbying are lawful, routine, and disclosed by design. A disclosed payment is a fact to note, never proof of influence, coordination, or a quid pro quo — and we never imply one. We publish the source alongside every claim, mark how confident we are, and — importantly — we publish what we left out. Hiding an inconvenient row would invite the very suspicion we're trying to dispel; showing our exclusions is how the work earns trust.
Two headline figures, defined precisely so they can't be mistaken for each other:
| Component | Amount | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Federal lobbying fees | $710,000 | U.S. Senate LDA (21 filings) |
| LA City lobbying fees | $107,500 | LA City Ethics (Veritas) |
| CA state organizational contributions | $30,941 | Cal-Access (Lineage Holdings, etc.) |
| Subtotal | $848,441 |
| Jurisdiction | Amount | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Federal | $433,195 | Marchetti $308,712 · Forste $123,983 · Lehmkuhl $500 net |
| CA state | $98,000 | Marchetti $46,500 · Forste $51,500 |
| LA City | $3,100 | Marchetti (Garcetti 2013, Bass 2026) |
| Subtotal | $534,295 |
The employee-aggregate lens ($159,456) — contributions by individuals who self-reported a Lineage employer — is reported separately and is not attributed to the company. Individual rank-and-file donors are kept as a pattern, not named.
Searching public databases by name surfaces a large crowd of look-alikes. The hard part of honest data work is throwing most of it away. We kept only rows we could confirm, and quarantined the rest — retained on disk, tagged, and contributing $0 to every total above.
We excluded roughly seven times more than we kept. The largest excluded group is the “Forster” clan (Juan Y. Forster, Katherine Forster, Egerton Forster, and dozens more) — a different surname from Bay Grove's Forste. Also excluded:
| Source | false_match | different | review (held out) |
|---|---|---|---|
| FEC bulk | $9,355,528 | $527,262 | $3,225 |
| Cal-Access | $173,948 | $117,326 | $32,708 |
Two records sharing a surname is not a match. We confirm identity with corroborating fields:
Federal contributions exist in two of our sources — a processed seed (which includes ActBlue conduit gifts) and the raw FEC bulk files (which do not). To avoid both double-counting and under-counting, we treat the seed as the complete base and add only genuinely new bulk rows, de-duplicated by transaction identity. The result reconciles to a single figure per person (e.g., Kevin Marchetti = $308,712), with no row counted twice.
Every row carries one of:
match identity confirmed different / review likely a different person, or not yet verified — excluded from totals false_match shares a search string but is a different person/entity — excluded aggregate employee self-reported employer — reported as a pattern, not by name
The full dataset is published as a spreadsheet (one tab per source plus a normalized “all money flows” tab), a queryable database, and the underlying filing PDFs, alongside a written reconciliation. To check any figure: open the row, follow its source link to the original filing, and confirm the contributor, employer, amount, and date. To check a total, filter the “all money flows” tab by confidence = match and sum. Excluded rows are present too, so you can audit what we left out.
Compiled June 25, 2026 from primary public records. Contributions and lobbying are lawful and disclosed by design; these are facts with confidence tags, not allegations of influence or wrongdoing, and no quid pro quo is implied. Rank-and-file individuals are reported in aggregate to protect personal privacy. This page is for public transparency and is not legal advice. Figures are reconciled to the dataset; where a live source updates, the dataset is refreshed and this page follows.